The cover of the New York Times Magazine on Sunday asked rhetorically in big white letters on (what purports to be) a starry background "Why Do We Believe? How evolutionary science explains faith in God," whispers the subtitle of the article by Robin Marantz Henig.
Henig suggests at one point in her essay that the current interest by evolutionary biologists in explaining the almost universal human belief in supernatural spirits (including, of course, the Big Guy Himself) is by way of revenge on the creationists who have so diligently sought to ban the teaching of evolution from the public schools (or at the very least counter natural selection with the pseudoscience called intelligent design). After all, belief is a natural phenomenon like sexual desire or the male propensity for violence. If desire and agression are evolved behaviors, why not religious faith?
Note here, as Henig is careful to assert, that it is the "behavior" of belief that scientists study, not the more abstract question of God's existence. But of course the implication is plain. If belief in a personal supernatural being who attends to our individual lives and hears and answers prayers is merely a more elaborate version of belief in fairies, poltergeists or the spirits of trees and brooks, then He is no more likely to exist than they. Har! Take that, creationists!
Well, revenge, I suppose, is sweet, but rather beside the point. If a tendency to populate the world with spirits is part of human nature, then evolutionary biology is not likely to have much effect on whether or not people believe. Even scientists can find ways to justify faith. The psychologist Justin Barrett is quoted by Henig: "Christian theology teaches that people were crafted by God to be in a loving relationship with him and other people. Why wouldn't God, then, design us in such a way as to find belief in divinity quite natural?"
There's no way to answer such a statement except to get out Ockham's Razor and start slashing away. If my belief or disbelief in a God who intervenes in human affairs makes not the slightest "empirically verifiable" difference in my life, then why believe? That's precisely the question evolutionary biologists are trying to answer, and more power to them. Meanwhile, if it is in my biological human nature to be religious, then I will be religious -- that is to say, reverent, celebratory and grateful in the face of the world's unfathomable Mystery -- but I will stay armed with the Razor and wary of anthropomorphic idols.
Tuesday, 19 August 2014
Labels
wicca
chemistry
christianity
thioethers
spirituality
witchcraft
blackmagic
christian theology
wiccans
alchemy
asatru
astrology
spells
alternative medicine
anthropology of religion
athame
candle
vodou
voodoo
spellsandmagic
whitemagic
talismans
theology
witches
catholic liturgy
spellbook
spiritualism
shamanism
solstice
wizardry
beltane
spell
thelema
binding
cauldron
chalice
thelemic
vodoo
alt.magick
sigil
alchemist
altar
breusch-pagan-godfrey
cast
charm
astrologia
astrological signs
buddhism
taoism
agnosticism
christian eschatology
talisman
tantra
theism
wand
werewolf
wicca.com
witch
anti-satanist
christo-paganism
thealogy
thelemical
wizard
bless
candlemas
caster
chant
staff
wicca.org
blessed
blessing
book of exodus
witchcrafts
amulet
celtic culture
spellcasters
spirit
tarot
telema
astronomy
spellcaster
chinese culture
chthonic
spiritism
veda
welsh mythology
wiltshire
ancient egypt
ascetics
banishing
cappadocia
chalcedonianism
chinese philosophy
shapeshifting
tattooing
totem
wicca tarot
zionism
amethyst
ampliatus
ancient greece
animal spirits
azazel
black magics
blackmagic spells
book of enoch
books of samuel
buddhism in russia
burqa
buryat people
business finance
carl jung
catechism
chakri dynasty
channelling
christian church
christian mystics
christian prayer
christology
clothing
solomon
spells for knowledge
summum
tamil people
tattoo
thailand
theosophy
voodoo black magic
wahhabi
wicca love spells
wicca seattle
wicca websites
wiccan rituals
wiccan supply