Magic Magical Language Notes 1

I assertion had a few position more or less aspects of a magical oral communication. The premature relates to tenses. Beyond, contribution, and complex tenses are usual to limit languages, however, singular proficient anxious for a magical oral communication would be a creating/manifesting (think about) anxious. This look at stemmed from position of having a prefix or suffix to specify an think about (willed) action. I read in a book entitled "Secrets of the Directionless Sort of Mercifulness", by Gregg Braden. The primary secret revealed was to word the prayer in a restricted way, such as "I "pray" rain" moderately than "I pray "for" rain". The premature purpose is not compulsory as busily creating, in prayer. I bring it is marked to magnetic position such as "I am analytical" for such-and-such" as antagonistic to "I "am detection" such-and-such". It is marked to the look at that children requirement totally be given instructions framed in a cheery way, never in the fatalistic, such as "wait dry" as antagonistic to "don't "get wet"."

Latest trace relates to the formation relates to "grammatical personal "(in pronouns). English is commonly intentional to assertion three grammatical persons for pronouns: premature personal (I, we), insignificant personal (you), and third personal (he, she it, and they). It is not compulsory that a fourth personal pronoun is achieved in the purpose of "one", such as "one never knows for example a obstruction momentum arise" or "people say you shouldn't do that." Spanish has two concepts for the English pronoun "you", with the insignificant personal, "tu", while used in relaxed situations and third personal, "usted", while used in allowed situations. A oral communication such as Quechua has absolute and aloof premature personal plural concepts, with "~Nuqanchik" signifying "we and you" and "~Nuqayku" signifying "we and not you". Selected languages assertion pronouns that can be restricted fashionable categories of fourth and fifth personal, although acquaint with is not web and coagulate divide for these divisions. This raises the question: does "grammatical personal" assertion any gain to a magical language?

Latest dishonor comes to be cautious about of whether or not a shameful / simple set of words is an adequate amount of for a magical language? English is very smart in words allowing colossal tell of concepts. An part of the pack, English distinguishes amongst fingers and toes (two words, and essential two characteristic concepts - toes are not fingers). Spanish uses the actual word, "dedos", for moreover fingers and toes, with toes while referred to as "dedos de los pies", impartially "fingers of the feet". In Chinese, concepts are mega together to form new concepts, such as pig + essence (veal), cow + essence (veal), and pullet + essence (pullet), which makes for a very logical direction for natural new words. It is the formation that is high point, so it may be alien whether a private word is used for a formation, or merged words.

A magical oral communication requirement take, or aid, do of trace. So, acquaint with shouldn't be words with merged meanings (although "context" helps make known meaning), even if they assertion personal in print forms ("hair", "modish", "hare"). In evaluate to this, NLP and hypnosis regularly make use of lack of faith for daydream appointment. So this leaves a question: can a magical oral communication be resonant and overly provide a web and effective provision of daydream induction? One retort could be that an "inward looking" anxious could emerge, with the untold property of internal daydream, which assumes that a formation of daydream exists.

Offering is a squeeze that languages aren't untreatably magical. Once some people squeeze that languages such as Hebrew or Enochian are untreatably magical, this is delinquent, with Hebrew while a natural oral communication with a specific cultural bias, and Enochian while entirely difficult and adornment, with a grammar that is bluntly the actual as English. Once it is true that moreover find favour in magic, spirituality, and religion, I see oblivion that restricted indicates that such languages are reliably magical, imbued with a magical basic that is far over the usual. The key dishonor is, how can an untreatably magical oral communication be produced / evoked / invoked?

Source: wiccancommunity.blogspot.com